Definition Moral Hazard Finance
Burak november 20 2018 mortgage leave a comment.
Definition moral hazard finance. Moral hazard is a situation in which one party gets involved in a risky event knowing that it is protected against the risk and the other party will incur the cost. In financial markets the mechanism for avoiding moral hazard is a bit different but the principle is the same. Prior to the financial crisis of 2008 when the housing bubble burst certain actions on the parts of lenders could qualify as moral hazard. They indulge in shirking and time wasting.
An example of moral hazard. By definition moral hazard is fundamentally based on asymmetric information. Moral hazard a situation in which one of the parties to a contract has an incentive after the contract is agreed to act in a manner that brings benefits to themselves at the expense of the other. Sometimes moral hazard is so severe that it makes insurance policies impossible.
Coinsurance co payments and deductibles reduce the risk of moral hazard by increasing the out of pocket spending of consumers which decreases their incentive to consume. It is the risk concept related to the attitude and habits of the insured. For example employees may work less conscientiously than expected by the terms of their contract of employment i e. Moral hazard is a problem that appears in financial markets as a consequence of the presence of asymmetric information which is when one party does not know enough about the other party to make accurate decisions.
The key is to make sure that those who are making the decisions about how to invest. Learn how it applies in the business world. Aegean finance everything about finance. Moral hazard is defined as the risk that a party has not entered into a contract in good faith or has provided misleading information about its assets credit capacity or liabilities.
Moral hazard meaning definition examples. It arises when both the parties have incomplete information about each other. Understand that moral hazard is the idea that a party protected in some way from risk will act differently than if they didn t have that protection.